Also the review of the X70 mentions it several times as a close call. Thanks for your help. Member Distinguished Member.
I really would suggest you demo both side by side in the same room so you could see for yourself the differences. Both run very very quiet so no real differences their to report.
Excellent blacks on both machines Does the JVC warrant the extra in cost, only you can decide but once again demo both at the same time in the same room and let your eyes tell you if 2D is your priority then maybe the JVC with e-shift clinches the crown. Allan Ideal AV.
Last edited: Jan 21, For us, the VW95 is currently the projector to beat. Both myself and a colleague have found that this is the first projector that's made us want to change our current PJ's. Stunning image. I want one. Chaps, will there be a big difference going from the jvc to the sony? I was thinking of going down the 3chip dlp route but the sony has been getting rave reviews - what do we think?
Not too fussed about 3d really and i dont buy into all that 4k nonsense with the jvc x Proper 4K2K for me too Sammy - no half jobs for me - I like films too much. I'll be all up for it when we have native 4k material, but all this lark about people seeing new detail which they didnt see on there p pjs without wobbulation doesnt sound right!
The sony is a handsome price mind-even if the 2d performance is a tad behind the x70s. Seeing the Sony 4K projector today. I'll let you know how much better the real 4k is over JVC e-shift tech. I have to say with SD the e-shift is amazing. I posted something in one of the other threads regarding this the other day. Chapter 9 is almost unbelievable. So we're not even being kind to the projectors at this level. It cannot be possible.
Regards, Shane. This is especially paid when at the same time are black and very light elements e. So a unique depth is achieved by high native contrast, which is not possible with Adaptive aperture systems. Well we've had a good two to three hours with the 4K Sony thank's to our Rep and the Sony is most certainly in a different league with resolution to the JVC X70r.
Playing the same footage and cinema electronics as I did on Monday. The Sony has so much extra detail in the image it was a real surprises. So the start of the demo was truly amazing and saying that it really did look like a HD Blu-ray movie was not far from the truth. You could tell the footage was poor, but compared to other projectors the image was on a par with sub standard DVD. The resolution is given as a compound value, comprised of horizontal and vertical pixels. Uses LED backlighting, resulting in better image quality, more vibrant colors and richer blacks.
The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience. Compared to standard dynamic range SDR video, HDR10 video has greater contrast and color depth, resulting in more realistic images. Local dimming is when sections of the LED array are turned off or dimmed to help produce the deep blacks and higher contrasts. It supports displaying 3D images from devices such as a 3D-compatible Blu-ray player, allowing you to watch films in 3D when using suitable glasses.
Devices supporting PiP and PaP - Picture in Picture can show two images from different sources at the same time by splitting the viewing window or creating a smaller window inside the bigger image. Connectivity 1. HDMI version 1. Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.
VGA connector is a widespread connector and is found on many video cards, computer monitors, and some television sets. Wi-Fi 4 It has faster transfer rates and improved security compared to its predecessors — a, b, and g. All DLNA-certified products are compatible with one another. When different devices are connected to the same network, data can be transferred easily between them.
Devices that support Miracast can communicate via wi-fi in an open format. Audio 1. If the device supports Dolby Digital it can deliver up to six different audio channels sides for a much better sound quality.
This approach minimises any lens distortions. While focus, zoom and lens shift are all motorised, neither of these two projectors has a motorised lens cap. It's far from a dealbreaker, just be careful when you place them back on, so as not to upset your carefully calibrated lens adjustments.
If you want a few handy hints on the set-up process for your new purchase, don't forget our guide on how to set up your projector and get the best picture. There are button controls on both of these projectors, but you'll be wedded to their remotes most of the time. Both are backlit so that you can find what you're looking for in the dark.
They're also both excellent, with full features and handy shortcuts to the settings you need. The Sony remote has a shade more functionality, but the JVC's is perhaps a touch simpler. There's not much between them on that front. The other area of design that might need careful consideration is what's built inside these machines. When buying any projector, it's well worth considering what kind of technology you're signing up for.
Some are transmissive ie. Texas Instruments' DLP chips that use micromirrors to create the pixels. These systems have different benefits, but there's no need to get too bogged down in that for this comparison. That's because both of these projectors use LCoS projection liquid crystal on silicon. Neither Sony nor JVC's version appears to be inherently better than the other but, combined with each company's glassware and image processors, there are certainly performance differences.
Higher-end 4K projectors, such as these two, don't usually come with rafts of extra features. They tend to concentrate on the serious business of performance instead. As such, you won't find any built-in speakers or smart platforms here and nor should you want them either.
There is one major feature difference between the two. Neither machine comes with 3D glasses in the box either. Replacement projector lamps are another potential cost. Both are rated at ANSI lumens but, according to the manufacturer estimations, Sony's should last longer.
It's predicted to last up to hours in 'Low' mode before it needs replacing, whereas the JVC will give you hours in its eco setting.
We wouldn't read too much into those stats, though. They're only estimations and we'd recommend running the lamps at maximum output anyway.
In any case, these hours represent a fair bit of viewing. All the same, if you do need to replace the lamp before you upgrade to an 8K projector, then, for now, the JVC's replacement lamp comes in marginally more expensive than the Sony's. Both projectors feature a pair of HDMI 2.
0コメント